| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 |
121. Goonswarm Federation: Sponsoring Emergent Gameplay! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Someone should make a corp just to gank gankers lol sit in a belt and kill every destroyer that enters Darth Tickles wrote: good, people changing their systems to react to outside pressures is the very point of events like hulkageddon ...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 20:59:00
|
122. Goonswarm Federation: Sponsoring Emergent Gameplay! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
EvilweaselSA wrote: EVE Roy Mustang wrote: EvilweaselSA wrote: the funny part is this combined with otec already pushed jita into a pretty severe recession hello, great eve depression hello, overinflated ego oh wait thats a requireme...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 20:55:00
|
123. Goonswarm Federation: Sponsoring Emergent Gameplay! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Funny thing; even IF enough miners quit the game that CCP takes notice and moves to curb the ganking nothing will change. You know why? Imagine if all 10,000 Goon accounts quit. Yeah who runs the game again? Its not CCP anymore Vicky Somers w...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 20:51:00
|
124. A Plea for Rationale in the System of Natural Consequences - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I still like my idea. low sec status you get podded. Real consequences for your actions. Unless of course that consequences thing is just another bs smoke screen like "we dont care about insurance" (given the QQ that came after the insurance ner...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 20:47:00
|
125. Goonswarm Federation: Sponsoring Emergent Gameplay! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
EvilweaselSA wrote: the funny part is this combined with otec already pushed jita into a pretty severe recession hello, great eve depression hello, overinflated ego oh wait thats a requirement for Goons. Carry on
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 20:43:00
|
126. Goonswarm Federation: Sponsoring Emergent Gameplay! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Its funny.... they want to hurt highsec miners, what theyre doing is helping those of us who know how to do it and NOT die
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 20:42:00
|
127. Goonswarm Federation: Sponsoring Emergent Gameplay! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
lol I shall continue mining, like I did through Hulkageddon, not caring about you guys. Thx for the increase in my wallet though. Decreasing the population of miners in high sec by that much has made me bank Far more than the covetor I fly costs lol
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 18:28:00
|
128. Goonswarm announces infinite Hulkageddon Payouts - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
lol the irony being that the hulk you lose was made by Goonswarm trademarked Moon Goo
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 18:23:00
|
129. Ally wardec system allready showing its flaws ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Destiny Corrupted wrote: Jonathan Malcom wrote: Your complaint seems to be that the barrier to entry in the field of Empire wardec circle-jerking has been lowered to essentially zero and the influx of fresh, ravenous combatants who have no c...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 14:44:00
|
130. What is the point of High Sec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: Simetraz wrote: Natsett Amuinn wrote: Can you point to the part were it says that other players can't target or shoot you in the "tutorial zones"? It has been stated over and over that you can't can bait newbi...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 14:40:00
|
131. A Challenge To All Carebears - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Greyscale Dash wrote: Watch this video of null sec pvp and tell me you don't want to be involved. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O76_hgZ2BQM&feature=related After seeing that, is there any way you can say, without lying, that you don't ...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 14:36:00
|
132. A Plea for Rationale in the System of Natural Consequences - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Ten Bulls wrote: Gameplay isnt fine, Hulks have to give up all defensive ability to gain a little more yield. No, they don't. really... post the build that gets max defense and max yield at the same time tippia, Im callin...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 14:34:00
|
133. A Plea for Rationale in the System of Natural Consequences - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ludi Burek wrote: 6.) Demanding that one play style is wrong and it should be curbed goes directly against the concept of the sandbox. ah, like James 315 and the gankers are DOING to the miners? Glad you agree with the miners then. Rub...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 14:30:00
|
134. Where is it that CCP says - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: How does my reply differ from that you quoted? The reasoning is that you're deliberately using free ships (noob frigates) and alts to bypass the risk and penalties incurred by angering CONCORD. The incurred penalties are ignored since t...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 03:52:00
|
135. Where is it that CCP says - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pak Narhoo wrote: EVE Roy Mustang wrote: Mara Rinn wrote: This is not an exploit. What is considered bannable is getting that alt to a negative security status and biomassing it. Yeah if you can prove it, which is impossible :p the lo...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 03:50:00
|
136. A Plea for Rationale in the System of Natural Consequences - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Asuri Kinnes wrote: baltec1 wrote: Asuri Kinnes wrote: baltec1 wrote: Good luck making any kind of profit on that kill. Dude, I don't know you, or where your coming from, but really, you sound as bad as any hi-sec carebear with your ...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 03:22:00
|
137. A Plea for Rationale in the System of Natural Consequences - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: EVE Roy Mustang wrote: baltec1 wrote: EVE Roy Mustang wrote: Its also suggested by Mittens in the Goonswarm Shrugged thread Google it. Its a good read Wrong again. That was undocking in an ibis after a gank to dra...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 03:21:00
|
138. Mining Profession Removal - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Tora reavs wrote: I think what is really needed is an "industrial" method of getting even with the gankers. For example, a market black list. Anyone ganking a miner would be placed on the list and would no longer be ...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 03:19:00
|
139. Where is it that CCP says - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Or until you clean it up Quote: Cleaning up your own CONCORD spawn, so other people can make their own attack runs, is actually really easy. Dock at the closest station to the belt you just ganked in, then immediately undock in a newbie ship a...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 03:16:00
|
140. Suicide Ganking is a Terrible Mechanic - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cutter Isaacson wrote: masternerdguy wrote: Seriously, it is broken beyond belief. The ganker always loses their ship and doesn't always kill the target?! Facts are suicide ganking is an inefficient method of asset destruction. It requires...
- by EVE Roy Mustang - at 2012.05.29 02:56:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |